中国血吸虫病防治杂志(中英文) ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 420-427.

• 医学信息 • 上一篇    下一篇

1990—2024年野生动物与人兽共患病关联领域研究热点与发展趋势

张智芳1,邓艳琴1,2,吴生根1,2*   

  1. 1 福建省疾病预防控制中心、福建省人兽共患病重点实验室(福建 福州 350012);2 福建医科大学公共卫生学院(福建 福州 350122)
  • 出版日期:2025-08-25 发布日期:2025-09-30
  • 通讯作者: 吴生根lxbywstj@126.com
  • 作者简介:张智芳,女,硕士,副主任医师。研究方向:人兽共患病
  • 基金资助:
    福建省卫生健康中青年领军人才研修培养项目(闽卫人函[2023]2839 号);福建省卫生健康科技计划项目(2023GGA041)

Global research hotspots and trends of wildlife⁃associated zoonoses from 1990 to 2024

ZHANG Zhifang1, DENG Yanqin1, 2, WU Shenggen1, 2*   

  1. 1 Fujian Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Zoonotic Diseases, Fuzhou, Fujian 350012, China; 2 School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350122, China
  • Online:2025-08-25 Published:2025-09-30

摘要: 目的 分析野生动物与人兽共患病关联领域的研究热点与发展趋势,为该研究领域发展提供参考。方法 在Web of Science核心合集数据库中检索1990—2024年野生动物与人兽共患病领域相关研究论文,用CiteSpace 6.3.R3软件分析1990—2024年各年发文量,并构建研究者、研究机构和国家之间合作情况的可视化图谱;通过绘制关键词共现、突现、聚类图谱和文献共被引聚类图谱,分析该领域的研究热点和前沿发展趋势。结果 本研究共纳入2 479篇英文文献进行文献计量学分析,自2001年起发文量逐年上升,2021年发文量最大(336篇)。1990—2024年有12位研究者发文量> 10篇;发文量居前10位的机构中有8所为高校,其中加州大学戴维斯分校发文量最多(114篇);在所有发文的国家中,美国发文量最多(1 004篇),且在国家合作中发挥较大中介作用,其中介中心性指数为0.31;作者、机构和国家合作网络图谱均呈现小范围密集、总体松散的特征。关键词共现分析发现感染(489次)、患病率(398次)、传播(351次)、野生动物(330次)和流行病学(231次)的关注度较高;关键词突现分析显示,野生动物与人兽共患病关联研究重点从旋毛虫病和结核病等某些特定人兽共患病转向野生动物贸易、毒力、全健康和抗生素耐药性等跨学科、综合性领域。关键词聚类显示,抗生素耐药性和全健康已成为该领域的研究热点;文献共被引聚类结果表明,人类健康、农业集约化、首例报告等是该领域的理论基础。结论 野生动物与人兽共患病关联研究在全球范围内呈现蓬勃的发展趋势,倡导践行全健康理念将是现阶段和未来防控新发和再现人兽共患病的重要任务。

关键词: 野生动物, 人兽共患病, 文献计量学分析, Citespace

Abstract: Objective To investigate the global hotspot issues and future directions of wildlife⁃associated zoonoses, so as to provide insights into identification of future research proprieties of wildlife⁃associated zoonoses.  Methods Research and review articles pertaining to wildlife⁃associated zoonoses were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection from 1990 to 2024, and the annual publication trends and visualization maps for research collaborations among authors, institutions and countries were analyzed using the software CiteSpace 6.3.R3. In addition, the keyword co⁃occurrence, burst and clustering maps and co⁃citation clustering maps were created to identify the research hotspots and frontier landscapes of wildlife⁃associated zoonoses.  Results A total of 2 479 English publications were included in this bibliometric analysis. The annual publication output started to increase since 2001, and peaked in 2021 (336 publications). There were 12 authors with more than 10 publications from 1990 to 2024. The top 10 most productive institutions included 8 colleges or universities, with University of California, Davis ranking first (114 publications). The United States of America played a significant mediating role in international collaborations (betweenness centrality = 0.31) and produced the largest number of publications (1 004), and the collaboration network maps among authors, institutions, and countries all appeared localized clustering with overall fragmentation. Keyword co⁃occurrence analysis identified high⁃frequency terms including infection (489 occurrences), prevalence (398 occurrences), transmission (351 occurrences), wildlife (330 occurrences) and epidemiology (231 occurrences), and keyword burst analysis revealed the research focus of wildlife⁃associated zoonoses shifting from specific zoonotic diseases such as trichinellosis and tuberculosis to interdisciplinary domains including wildlife trade, virulence, One Health, and antimicrobial resistance. Keyword clustering analysis identified antimicrobial resistance and One Health as current research hotspots, and co⁃citation clustering analysis showed human health, agricultural intensification, and first case reports as theoretical basis for wildlife⁃associated zoonoses. Conclusions The wildlife⁃associated zoonoses research has expanded exponentially across the world. Advocating for One health concept is an important task for management of emerging and re⁃emerging zoonoses currently and in future.

Key words: Wildlife, Zoonosis, Bibliometric analysis, Citespace

中图分类号: