自育与非自育淡色库蚊体内菌群多样性比较

doi:10.1620/j.32.1374.2023204

中国血吸虫病防治杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 52-58,73.DOI: 10.1620/j.32.1374.2023204

自育与非自育淡色库蚊体内菌群多样性比较

类晶晶，吕文祥，王文倩，王海防，郭秀霞，程鹏，公茂庆，刘丽娟*

山东省寄生虫病防治研究所、山东第一医科大学（山东省医学科学院）（山东济宁 272033）

出版日期:2024-02-15 发布日期:2024-04-03
作者简介:类晶晶，女，硕士研究生。研究方向：媒介蚊虫防制
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（81902096，81871685）；山东省医学科学院医药卫生科技创新工程

Comparison of the microbiota diversity between autogenous and anautogenous Culex pipiens pallens

LEI Jingjing, LÜ Wenxiang, WANG Wenqian, WANG Haifang, GUO Xiuxia, CHENG Peng, GONG Maoqing, LIU Lijuan*

Shandong Institute of Parasitic Diseases; Shandong First Medical University ＆ Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jining, Shandong 272033, China

Online:2024-02-15 Published:2024-04-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的　了解自育与非自育淡色库蚊体内菌群组成与多样性差异，从而为探索淡色库蚊自育发生机制提供参考依据。方法　收集25 ℃自育与非自育淡色库蚊成蚊，利用Illumina NovaSeq 6000测序平台对细菌16S核糖体RNA基因高变区进行测序。采用α多样性指数分析菌群丰富度和多样性，采用β多样性指数分析菌群结构差异，通过线性判别分析效应大小（linear discriminant analysis effect size, LEfSe）鉴别组间在丰度上具有显著差异的菌群。结果　自育与非自育淡色库蚊体内菌群隶属18个门、28个纲、70个目、113个科和170个属，优势菌门主要有变形菌门、拟杆菌门等。在属水平，沃尔巴克氏体菌属为共有优势菌属，在自育及非自育淡色库蚊中的相对丰度分别为（77.62 ± 11.35）%和（47.52 ± 8.54）%；粪杆菌属（0.42% ± 0.11%）、杜氏杆菌属（0.54% ± 0.00%）、马赛菌属（0.52% ± 0.07%）等为自育淡色库蚊特有菌属。α多样性分析显示，自育淡色库蚊体内菌群Chao1指数和ACE指数大于非自育淡色库蚊（P均 > 0.05），而Shannon指数（P > 0.05）和Simpson指数（P < 0.05）小于非自育淡色库蚊。LEfSe分析结果显示，共计48个分类单元在自育和非自育淡色库蚊间存在显著差异（P均 < 0.05）。结论　自育与非自育淡色库蚊体内菌群多样性存在显著差异。　

关键词: 淡色库蚊, 自育, 16S核糖体RNA, 菌群构成, Alpha多样性, Beta多样性

Abstract: Objective　To investigate the microbiota composition and diversity between autogenous and anautogenous Culex pipiens pallens, so as to provide insights into unraveling the pathogenesis of autogeny in Cx. pipiens pallens. Methods　Autogenous and anautogenous adult Cx. pipiens pallens samples were collected at 25 ℃, and the hypervariable regions of the microbial 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene was sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 sequencing platform. The microbiota abundance and diversity were evaluated using the alpha diversity index, and the difference in the microbiota structure was examined using the beta diversity index. The microbiota with significant differences in the abundance between autogenous and anautogenous adult Cx. pipiens pallens samples was identified using the linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe). Results　The microbiota in autogenous and anautogenous Cx. pipiens pallens samples belonged to 18 phyla, 28 classes, 70 orders, 113 families, and 170 genera, and the dominant phyla included Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and so on. At the genus level, Wolbachia was a common dominant genus, and the relative abundance was (77.62 ± 11.35)% in autogenous Cx. pipiens pallens samples and (47.52 ± 8.54)% in anautogenous mosquito samples, while Faecalibaculum (0.42% ± 0.11%), Dubosiella (0.54% ± 0.00%) and Massilia (0.52% ± 0.07%) were specific species in autogenous Cx. pipiens pallens samples. Alpha diversity analysis showed that higher Chao1 index and ACE index in autogenous Cx. pipiens pallens samples than in anautogenous samples (both P values > 0.05), and lower Shannon index (P > 0.05) and Simpson index (P < 0.05) in autogenous Cx. pipiens pallens samples than in anautogenous samples. LEfSe analysis showed a total of 48 significantly different taxa between autogenous and anautogenous Cx. pipiens pallens samples (all P values < 0.05). Conclusion　There is a significant difference in the microbiota diversity between autogenous and anautogenous Cx. pipiens pallens.

Key words: Culex pipiens pallens, Autogeny, 16S ribosomal RNA, Microbiota composition, Alpha diversity, Beta diversity

中图分类号:

R384.1

类晶晶, 吕文祥, 王文倩, 王海防, 郭秀霞, 程鹏, 公茂庆, 刘丽娟. 自育与非自育淡色库蚊体内菌群多样性比较 [J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2024, 36(1): 52-58,73.

LEI Jingjing, LÜ Wenxiang, WANG Wenqian, WANG Haifang, GUO Xiuxia, CHENG Peng, GONG Maoqing, LIU Lijuan. Comparison of the microbiota diversity between autogenous and anautogenous Culex pipiens pallens[J]. Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control, 2024, 36(1): 52-58,73.

[1]	段磊, 屈磊, 郭云海, 顾文彪, 吕山, 张仪, 周晓农. 我国藁杆双脐螺分子溯源研究 [J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2024, 36(3): 272-278,285.
[2]	韩忍忍, 张大存, 王澜, 汤非凡, 曹佳诚, 王婧璇, 湛孝东, 谷生丽. 人体蠕形螨体内细菌群落多样性分析 [J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2024, 36(2): 174-178.
[3]	刘玉婷, 王丹, 贺志权, 钱丹, 刘颖, 杨成运, 鲁德领, 张红卫. 河南省常见蚊种中沃尔巴克氏体感染分子检测及系统进化分析[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2023, 35(4): 389-397.
[4]	王欢, 刘进, 开力买·艾尼, 郑俊楠, 沈波, 孙艳, 周丹. 血管紧张素转换酶对淡色库蚊生殖的影响 [J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2023, 35(3): 251-257.
[5]	刘福岩，张倩，郭秀霞，宋晓，张崇星. 利用蛋白组学解析淡色库蚊对氯氰菊酯的抗性机制[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2021, 33(2): 189-.
[6]	王英藩，何坤，郭蔚，王海防，张东辉，公茂庆，季旻珺，陈琳5. 淡色库蚊自然种群沃尔巴克氏体感染致细胞质不亲和相关基因初探[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2020, 32(5): 517-.
[7]	宋晓，程鹏，王海防，郭秀霞，吕晔源，刘宏美，刘丽娟，张崇星，赵玉强，寇景轩，王怀位，公茂庆. 鲁西南地区淡色库蚊抗药性评价[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2020, 32(1): 69-.
[8]	张本光，李亚平，马荣，程鹏，郭秀霞，王海防，刘丽娟. 低温对淡色库蚊海藻糖和海藻糖酶的影响 [J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2019, 31(5): 510-.
[9]	张倩，石桂红，郭秀霞，王海防，张杰，张崇星. 基于iTRAQ的定量蛋白质组学技术探索淡色库蚊越冬机制 [J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2019, 31(2): 160-164,168.
[10]	张伟，方圆，张仪，施文琦，李元元，岳志远. 山东省淄博市淄川区淡色库蚊kdr等位基因突变研究[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2019, 31(2): 134-138.
[11]	严冬梅, 石桂红, 李怀菊, 张崇星, 魏冬冬, 刘波. 山东省淡色库蚊越冬情况调查[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2018, 30(1): 65-67,71.
[12]	魏星, 杨小迪, 王小莉, 李江艳, 王媛媛, 夏惠, 常雪莲, 方强. 安徽省中北部淡色库蚊对多种杀虫剂抗性及其kdr基因突变研究[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2016, 28(4): 406-410.
[13]	韩光杰, 李传明, 孙俊, 刘琴, 赵松, 祁建杭, 徐健. 苏云金杆菌以色列亚种对蚊幼虫体内解毒酶活性的影响[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2015, 27(4): 385-.
[14]	洪善超, 吕园, 方福谨, 朱昌亮. 沃尔巴克氏体与淡色库蚊溴氰菊酯抗性关系初步研究[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2014, 26(6): 672-.
[15]	蒋滨, 李士根, 全芯, 薛庆节, 谭文彬, 刘永春, 王新国, 王怀位. 淡色库蚊对3种化学杀虫剂交互抗性的实验研究[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2014, 26(5): 531-.

自育与非自育淡色库蚊体内菌群多样性比较

Comparison of the microbiota diversity between autogenous and anautogenous Culex pipiens pallens

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics