Chin J Schisto Control ›› 2012, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 729-730.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Detecting effect comparison between MPAIA|DDIA and IHA for screening
advanced schistosomiasis

TU Jia-lin1|JIANG Chang-fu|ZHANG You-jun1|YAO Lan2|YIN Qi-bo1|WEI Lan-ying2|FANG Zheng-ming2|HUANG Jin2*   

  • Online:2012-12-14 Published:2012-12-19

MPAIA DDIA和IHA筛查晚期血吸虫患者效果的比较

凃家林1|姜昌富2|张友军1|姚蓝2|尹其波2|魏兰英1|方正明2|黄进2*   

  1. 1 武汉市蔡甸区血吸虫病专科医院(武汉430100);2华中科技大学同济医学院病原生物学系

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the effects of the magnetic particle antibody immunoassay(MPAIA),dipstick dye immu?
noassay(DDIA)and indirect hemagglutination assay(IHA),on detecting advanced schistosomiasis. Methods The sera of 224
cases of advanced schistosomiasis were detected by MPAIA,DDIA,and IHA,and the positive rates were compared. Results
The positive rates of MPAIA,DDIA and IHA,were 67.14%,14.29% and 16.52%,respectively,the positive coincidence rate of
MPAIA is higher than the one of IHA and DDIA. Conclusion The value of MPAIA is higher than that of DDIA or IHA in screen?
ing advanced schistosomiasis.

Key words: Advanced schistosomiasis;Magnetic particle antibody immunoassay(MPAIA);Dipstick dye immunoassay(DDIA);Indirect hemagglutination assay(IHA);Diagnosis

摘要:

目的观察磁微粒分离酶联免疫法(MPAIA)、胶体染料试纸条(DDIA)和间接血凝试验(IHA)用于晚期血吸虫病(晚血)患者筛查的效果。方法MPAIA、DDIA和IHA分别检测224例晚血患者血清抗体,比较不同方法的阳性检出率。结果224例晚血患者MPAIA、IHA和DDIA检测的阳性率分别为67.14%、16.52%和14.29%。晚血患者血清MPAIA检测的阳性符合率均高于IHA和DDIA。结论MPAIA用于筛查晚血患者的价值高于IHA和DDIA。

关键词: 晚期血吸虫病;磁颗粒免疫分析法;胶体染料试纸条法;间接血凝法;诊断

CLC Number: