中国血吸虫病防治杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 240-.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于德尔菲法的湖北省血吸虫病传播阻断后风险评估指标体系构建

陈艳艳,刘建兵,钟晨晖,肖瑛,魏凤华,杨军晶,张卫红,刘斯*   

  1. 湖北省疾病预防控制中心(武汉430079)
  • 出版日期:2021-07-09 发布日期:2021-07-09
  • 作者简介:陈艳艳,女,副主任医师。研究方向:血吸虫病流行病学
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省自然科学基金 (2019CFB114);湖北省卫生计生科研基金资助项目(WJ2018H251)

Establishment of an indicator system for schistosomiasis transmission risk assessment after transmission interruption in Hubei Province based on the Delphi method

CHEN Yan⁃Yan, LIU Jian⁃Bing, ZHONG Chen⁃Hui, XIAO Ying, WEI Feng⁃Hua, YANG Jun⁃Jing, ZHANG Wei⁃Hong, LIU Si*   

  1. Hubei Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan 430079, China
  • Online:2021-07-09 Published:2021-07-09

摘要: 目的 构建湖北省血吸虫病传播阻断后风险评估指标体系(下文简称“风险评估指标体系”),为血吸虫病精准防控提供依据。方法 通过资料收集、文献检索和专家访谈,初步构建风险评估指标体系。选择专家开展两轮咨询,根据指标重要性、可操作性、敏感性及综合评分对指标体系进行筛选,计算各指标权重,通过计算专家积极系数、权威程度和协调系数对德尔菲法可信度进行评价。结果 初步构建了包括3个一级指标、12个二级指标和44个三级指标的风险评估指标体系。共选择从事血吸虫病预防控制、管理和研究工作的17名专家开展专家咨询。经过两轮专家咨询,最终构建了包括3个一级指标、10个二级指标和35个三级指标的风险评估指标体系。一级指标中,归一化权重最高的指标为疫情现状(0.420 2),其次为社会因素(0.397 3)、自然环境(0.182 5)。二级指标中,组合权重较高的分别是风险监测(0.142 3)、螺情现状(0.140 1)和人畜感染现状(0.137 8)。三级指标中,组合权重较高的分别是野粪阳性率(0.049 8)、钉螺感染率(0.047 4)和水淹钉螺面积(0.046 8)。两轮咨询中,专家积极系数分别为85.00%和100.00%,专家权威系数均≥ 0.75;两轮专家协调系数分别在0.405~0.521和0.592~0.695(P均<0.05)。结论 本研究基于德尔菲法构建了湖北省风险评估指标体系,可为全省血吸虫病传播风险识别、防治靶点定位提供依据。  

关键词: 血吸虫病, 风险评估, 指标体系, 德尔菲法, 湖北省

Abstract: Objective To establish an indicator system for assessment of schistosomiasis transmission risk after transmission interruption in Hubei Province, so as to provide insights into the precise control of schistosomiasis. Methods The indicator system was preliminarily established based on data collection, literature review, expert interviews. Two rounds of expert consultation were performed. The indicator system was screened based on the importance, operability, sensitivity and comprehensive score of the indicators, and the weights of each indicator were calculated. The credibility of the Delphi method was evaluated by calculating the active coefficient of the experts, degree of expert authority and coordination levels of experts’ opinions. Results An indicator system for assessment of schistosomiasis transmission risk was preliminarily established, including 3 primary indicators, 12 secondary indicators and 44 tertiary indicators. A Delphi consultation was performed among 17 experts participating in schistosomiasis control, management and research. Following two rounds of consultation, a risk assessment indicator system was finally constructed, including 3 primary indicators, 10 secondary indicators and 35 tertiary indicators. Among the primary indicators, the variable with the highest normalized weight was the current status of schistosomiasis (0.420 2), followed by social factors (0.397 3) and natural environments (0.182 5). Among the secondary indicators, those with high combined weights included risk monitoring (0.142 3), current snail status (0.140 1), and current prevalence of human and livestock infections (0.137 8). Among the tertiary indicators, those with high combined weights included the positive rate of wild feces (0.049 8), the prevalence of snail infections (0.047 4), and the area of snail habitats submerged by floods (0.046 8). During the two⁃round consultation, the active coefficients of the experts were 85.00% and 100.00%, the degree of expert authority was both 0.75 and greater, and the coordination levels of experts’opinions were 0.405 to 0.521 and 0.592 to 0.695 (all P values < 0.05). Conclusion An indicator system for assessment of schistosomiasis transmission risk is successfully established after transmission interruption in Hubei Province based on the Delphi method, which provides insights into the identification of the schistosomiasis transmission risk and the targets for schistosomiasis control in Hubei Province.

Key words: Schistosomiasis, Risk assessment, Indicator system, Delphi method, Hubei Province

中图分类号: