中国血吸虫病防治杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 47-.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

Kato-Katz法检测土源性线虫病现场评价体系的建立

朱慧慧,周长海,诸廷俊,钱门宝,黄继磊,陈颖丹*   

  1. 中国疾病预防控制中心寄生虫病预防控制所、国家热带病研究中心、世界卫生组织热带病合作中心、科技部国家级热带病国际联合研究中心、国家卫生健康委员会寄生虫病原与媒介生物学重点实验室(上海 200025)
  • 出版日期:2020-03-03 发布日期:2020-03-03
  • 作者简介:朱慧慧,女,硕士,助理研究员。研究方向:土源性、食源性寄生虫病防治

Establishment of an evaluation system for the field assessment of the Kato-Katz technique in detection of soil?transmitted nematodiasis

ZHU Hui-Hui, ZHOU Chang-Hai, ZHU Ting-Jun, QIAN Men-Bao, HUANG Ji-Lei, CHEN Ying-Dan*   

  1. National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention; Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research; WHO Collaborating Centre for Tropical Diseases; National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases, Ministry of Science and Technology; Key Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, National Health Commission, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Online:2020-03-03 Published:2020-03-03

摘要: 目的 建立Kato?Katz法检测土源性线虫病现场评价体系,为Kato?Katz法的现场应用提供参考。方法 通过文献查询、头脑风暴法和专家咨询法初步确定Kato?Katz法检测土源性线虫病现场评价指标体系;采用专家咨询法,通过3轮专家咨询完善评价指标体系并计算各指标权重,同时计算各轮专家咨询各指标的专家权威系数和协调系数。结果 3轮专家咨询的问卷回收率分别为100.00%、100.00%和89.29%,各指标专家权威系数均> 0.85。最终确定了包含4个一级指标和15个二级指标的评价体系。一级指标中“检测效果”和“投入经费”的加权均值分别为4.53和4.49,相对高于“投入人时”和“可操作性”(加权均值均为4.34);二级指标按重要性大小排序依次为“检测人员虫卵形态鉴别能力”、“村干部和村医配合度”、“检测人时”和“组织发动费用”,其加权均值分别为4.74、4.43、4.39和4.17。第1~3轮专家咨询各指标协调系数范围分别为0.39~0.65、0.28~0.58和0.45~0.65,且3轮专家咨询各指标协调系数差异均有统计学意义(P均 < 0.05)。结论 本研究建立了Kato?Katz法检测土源性线虫病现场评价体系。在该指标体系中,“检测人员虫卵形态鉴别能力”和“村干部和村医配合度”重要性加权均值最高。

关键词: 土源性线虫病, Kato?Katz法, 评价体系, 专家咨询法

Abstract: Objective To establish an evaluation system for the field assessment of the Kato?Katz technique in detecting soil?transmitted nematodes, so as to provide insights into the field application of the Kato?Katz technique. Methods The initial?evaluation indicators were determined through literature search, brainstorming and expert consultation. The evaluation indicators were improved and the weight of each indicator was decided through three rounds of expert consultation by using the Delphi method. In addition, the expert authority coefficient and the coordination coefficient of each indicator were calculated at each round of expert consultations. Results The recovery rates of the questionnaire were 100.00%, 100.00% and 89.29% at the first to the third round of the expert consultations, respectively, and the expert authority coefficients were all more than 0.85 at each round. The final evaluation system included 4 first?level indicators and 15 second?level indicators. In the first?level indicators, ''detecting effect'' and ''funds investment'' had the mean weighted value of 4.53 and 4.49, which were relatively higher than that of ''person?time investment'' and "operability'' (both 4.34). Among the second?level indicators under each first?level indicator, the four most significant indicators included ''ability of personnel in egg discrimination'', ''cooperation of village cadres and doctors'', ''Person?time on testing'' and ''organizational start?up cost'', with the mean weighted values of 4.74, 4.43, 4.39 and 4.17, respectively. The coordination coefficients were 0.39 to 0.65, 0.28 to 0.58 and 0.45 to 0.65 at the first to the third round of the expert consultations, respectively, and there were significant differences in the coordination coefficients at all three rounds of the consultations (P < 0.05). Conclusion An evaluation system for the field assessment of the Kato?Katz technique in detecting soil?transmitted nematodes is successfully established, among which ''ability of personnel in egg discrimination'' and ''cooperation of village cadres and doctors'' have the greatest mean weighted values of the significance.

Key words: Soil?transmitted nematodiasis, Kato?Katz technique, Evaluation system, Delphi method

中图分类号: